Monday, December 29

Coincidence Of 400 Year Old Chalice Being Re-United With It's Lid

16th century chalice

Sara Richards
Sara Richards has had an interest in antiques for many years and acquired a silver lid some twelve years ago. She wasn't too sure what the lid belonged to: a teapot perhaps or a sugar basin?

Eventually, after much research she discovered that it was in fact a lid to a chalice - a very old one at that, could well be from the 1500s.

Time passed, as it tends to do, and about twelve years after discovering the lid Sara went to evening classes on the subject of archaeology. At the class she met Canon Graham Loveluck a priest on Anglesey in Wales.

Canon Graham Loveluck
The pair got talking and for some reason Sara mentioned the lid she had found and how it could well belong to a 16th Century chalice. Canon Loveluck told her he had such a chalice at his church and this had a missing lid.

Surely they couldn't belong together! Out of interest the lid was taken to the chalice and sure enough, like Cinderella and her slipper, the lid fit.

But that wasn't all, through various markings and designs they discovered that this was the actual, original lid to the chalice. A photo of the two was even discovered in a very old book. How the two parts were ever separated is a mystery but the two are now happily reunited. After existing for over 400 years they belong together.

Old book showing 16th centiry chalice

The photo below shows Sara Richards and Canon Graham Loveluck reuniting the lid with the chalice - or maybe the other way round: the chalice with the lid.

Sara Richards and Canon Loveluck reuniting the lid with the chalice

Random Coincidence Stories:
He Discovered That The House He Bought Was Built By His Ancestor
Photo Taken Of Father Showed His Missing Daughter
D'Artagnan And The Violinist's Castle Coincidence

Bookmark and Share

7 comments:

  1. Incredible story and so glad the two parts were reunited. I bet that chalice is worth a penny or two, especially now it has its lid back.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I never thought of that - the chalice must be worth more now though.

      Delete
  2. Remarkable synchro! It's one of those stories that underscores the odds.

    ReplyDelete
  3. $00 years old! What a story.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Should have been 400 - not $00. sorry Mike.

      Delete
    2. Money on your mind? :-)

      Delete